An Occupied Country


When people refer to occupation governments or occupied countries, the first thought is often of military occupation—the garrisoning of foreign troops in one’s cities and civil administration by their military executives. The other vision is the trope of a cabal of Haredim sitting in a darkly-lit boardroom with a map of the world on the wall, a dated reading of the Jewish Question (JQ) based on the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which was understandably popularized after the ((((Bolshevik)))) conquest of Russia. If occupation government means martial law by foreigners or kowtowing to the Chief Rabbi of New York, London, or Moscow, it is a hard sell to suggest this is what we are dealing with. Considering Western countries, especially the United States and those in Western Europe, to be occupied sounds bizarre and conspiratorial to someone with one of these narrow or traditional definitions—likely most people. But despite the inaccuracies of the military, colonial, or ZOG notions of “occupation government” in describing literally what is happening, I think the term is still a useful as a metaphor for conveying the reality of rule by anti-majority.

I will define an occupation government as having these qualities:

  • It is dominated by a hostile, foreign, politically minority or ethnically minority elite. In fact, more realistically,  it may be dominated by a combination of these factions and local collaborators. E.g. overseas Israelis, communists, anti-white liberals (and conservatives), other ethnocentric non-jewish minorities such as blacks, mestizos, etc in the United States. This is not something I have concocted up but something with nebulous historical antecedents, e.g. Austrians and Hungarians being minorities in their halves of Austria-Hungary, the White Raj (British India), the Protestant Ascendancy of Ireland, French Algeria, Mamluk Egypt (Turco-Circassian ruled), the multi-ethnic and multi-faith Ottoman Empire (ruled by Turks and often with Greeks, Armenians and Albanians in high profile administrative, military and economic positions), Apartheid-era South Africa, Alawite-dominated Syria under the Assad dynasty, etc. The list goes on. This is a real historical phenomenon, and minorities or pluralities are rational actors in advancing their interests and collaborating to exercise power and privileges over a majority.
  • In order to advance socially, politically or economically as individuals, the subject population is required to work against their own group interests and to the benefit of the elite. It may of course be argued that we are always working for the benefit of our elites, but the key dynamic here is that the relationship is one of net harm in the long-term. For example, the government is one of the largest employers in the United States, and many processes it hires people to help it run are anti-white, such as immigration, refugee resettlement, affirmative action, equal opportunity compliance, etc. These further the dispossession of the White majority, which will be a minority in the United States in our lifetimes, while at the same time providing a source of employment.
  • The regime possess the ability to implement unpopular policies through diktat or legalism. A classic example of this is passing restrictions on what one might call rights or liberties or privileges—what kind of people willingly renounce those without being pressured or goaded to do so or not oppose the people taking them away? An occupied people of course. Of course we need our speech and right to arms restricted—it’s for our own good! Sometimes the institutions that the occupied people are familiar with—especially legislatures and courts—will be co-pted for this purpose, since it gives an air of legitimacy to the occupation government and makes opposition management easier. For example, if a law in the United States is challenged, it has to be ruled constitutional by a Supreme Court that is one-third overseas Israeli in order for it to be considered legally binding. Such influence is wildly disproportionate and reflects the anti-majority elitist character of the occupation government.
  • Opposition is managed such that it isn’t allowed to spiral out of control and become an existential threat to the occupation. If there are—and there must be—voices against the status quo, the occupation government will to the best of its ability attempt to marginalize and suppress these voices enough that it does not alienate neutral or less hostile voices. Successful efforts to legally ban “hate speech” and historiography of the Holocaust in Europe and similar social attempts to suppress free speech in the United States, the demonization of White ethno-centricism by the media and the chattering class, and ample funding for ethnic lobbies and “hate group” watchdogs are all examples of managing the only meaningful opposition to the occupation government, that is to say White Nationalism. Mainline conservatism (i.e. cuckservatism or reduced-speed liberalism) is also a form of opposition management as it gives frustrated members of the occupied population a safe outlet. Whether or not the Affordable Care Act is struck down, homosexuals are allowed to claim one another as spouses, or we decide on a country to blow up on behalf of Israel and Wilsonian neocons has nothing to do with dismantling the occupation government at all. But it sure wastes a lot of time and energy that could go be better spent opposing say, displacement-level immigration.
  • The occupation is more of a social superorganism than a ruling junta. Even without executive types like Barack Obama, Benjamin Netanyahu, ((((George Soros)))), Hillary Clinton, the Bush family, the Rockefeller family, or institutions like NATO, the Bilderberg Group, AIPAC, the ADL, the SPLC or any other number of people or organizations you can name that seem to fulfill the Protocols trope, there would still be thousands and likely millions of people on the full scale of Western society working together deliberately, coincidentally or incidentally towards the same interests that run contrary to those of the White majority of Europe and the Anglo settler colonies. There is a kind of distributed intelligence created by individual government executives, business executives, NGOs, lobbyists, politicians, journalists, bureaucrats and state employees, celebrities, bloggers, human resources departments, academics, educators, diversity compliance… you get the idea. The notion that society is centrally directed from the top-down has become increasingly inaccurate in an era of memes, digitization, globalization and mass media. There are undoubtedly power centers, but also power nodes and conduits which may or may not actively work with one another. A large bulk of dedicated people believe in the memes of diversity, anti-racism (combating White ethnocentrism), increasing the size and scope of the government, disarming the population, and so forth. These people never have to meet with one another and establish best practices or discuss strategy to spread or enforce these ideas, they just do it. Your organs never ask one another to keep you alive. They just do or don’t.

When I say the United States, Britain, Germany, etc. are occupied countries, I am not talking about a room filled with Israeli colonels and Fortune 500 CEOs—though those rooms probably do exist and are important. I am talking about a coalition of minority interests that reward collaborators and run contrary to our interests and exploit us. I am talking about the macro scale of thousands upon thousands of dedicated ideologues and hundreds of thousands if not millions of collaborators, exercising authority and influence over majority of neutral or fearful people and directing their energies towards making sure the opposition is marginalized, pathologized hated, hounded and rendered illegitimate. Why do millions of White people commit themselves to the idea of fighting racism, that is to say opposing White ethnocentrism? I believe the answer is extremely simple—the social superorganism of our anti-white elite and their collaborators, or “society,” is telling them to do so through a mixture of  what are sometimes centrally directed signals but more widely speaking attitudes and moods coming from a range of sources considered legitimate. Ultimately, what we call it doesn’t matter—it doesn’t care. What matters is understanding that whatever it is or was, it works against us. It is not a coincidence that indigenous nationalism is suppressed and vitriolically counter-signaled in most Western countries.

This entry was posted in America, Culture, Ideology and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

56 Responses to An Occupied Country

  1. You might find C. S. Lewis’s “conquered and occupied city” of Edgestow from his novel That Hideous Strength — IMHO, a neglected masterpiece of dystopian literature — a useful point of comparison.


  2. Laguna Beach Fogey says:

    Excellent. The implications are significant if you accept that this is an occupied country, and that the current regime is illegitimate.


    • Thanks. A major barrier to conservatives accepting the revolutionary premises of nationalism is that they are simply too used to the notion of the government as still being We The People…


  3. Pingback: Cuck Dynasty: How Clan Bush Blew One Hundred Million Dollars | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  4. Nobody says:

    “Overseas Israelis”. Top fucking kek. I’m stealing this one, if you don’t mind. Perhaps “overseas Israelis promoting a hateful semitic canard”?

    “The occupation is more of a social superorganism than a ruling junta”
    I think you’re onto something here. I came across a more general version of this idea in a book I read a couple of years ago (then promptly forgot the title and author). Essentially, intelligence is an emergent property of networks, AND is independent of self-awareness/ conscious purpose. Termites don’t conspire to build a termite mound; they have certain rather simple behavioral tendencies that when combined in a group, lead to production of termite mounds. The colony has a simple form of intelligence that is greater than any indivual termite. On a much more complex level, your immune system is highly intelligent. It is able to recognize thousands of different pathogens and generate an organized, tailored response to each one. But your T-lymphocytes don’t have meetings to plan their attack on a virus.

    Any actual conscious conspiracy is an epiphenomenom. It happens, but the underlying problem is deeper: the inborn behavioral tendencies of this group (marked ethnocentrism, high verbal intelligence, skill at deception, tolerance for cognitive dissonance) lead them to behave in ways that produce the same results time after time. See Kevin MacDonald etc.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yeah go right ahead. Spread the memes


      • Dave Alera says:

        >Spread the memes
        I did notice that one of your articles contained the word “Sandernistas” in it, which – I like to think – I coined or at least helped make popular on Internet forums. It just seems so fitting, that and “Bernouts” too. Anyway, this was a good read. Occupation doesn’t always entail military force; subtle usurpation works just as well, if not better.


  5. Pingback: Constitutional Logic and the Sanhedrin | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  6. Pingback: Bernie Bros and the Cannibalization of the Left | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  7. Pingback: An Occupied Country – Pinecone Utopia

  8. JudgeDr3dd says:

    This article was linked from a forum I frequent and I’m very pleased it was. Quite the inciteful piece and food for thought. Still looking for solutions though.


  9. ES3 says:

    What a delightful thing to have stumbled upon this blog, keep it up, you are quite compelling.


  10. Pingback: On Doomism | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  11. Pingback: Press F to Pay Respects to Scalia | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  12. Pingback: In Flanders Fields | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  13. Pingback: Mission Matters | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  14. Pingback: On the Regressive Left | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  15. Pingback: White Nationalism FAQ | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  16. Pingback: Hail Polarization | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  17. Pingback: Obama to Europe: Do as You are Told | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  18. Pingback: Assessing Trump’s ‘America First’: Muscular Americentrism Meets Neoconservatism | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  19. Pingback: Facebook is the Nuclear ICBM of Metapolitical Warfare | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  20. Pingback: Netanyahu: Iran Making Holocaust Cartoons While Planning a New Holocaust – aladdinsmiraclelamp

  21. Pingback: Identity Politics are Ripping Us Apart? For You | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  22. Pingback: On Normies | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  23. i d says:

    “ample funding for ethnic lobbies and “hate group” watchdogs”

    Is this an 4nti-Semit1c hinting at us?

    The South3rn P0verty L4w(making) Cent3r


    • i d says:


      I agree the Internet etc. has made the top-down model a little outdated, but as I see it it still all starts from the highest storey, and is then passed down/trickles down by a societal force we could compare to gravity.

      Needless to say the alien occupying elite couldn’t achieve their wishes till the local ethnicity had their healthy will-to-life. And no, it wasn’t the occupying elite to engender the local ethnicity subconscious wish to disappear and masochism; they just feast with it in glee, and work hard to amplify, consolidate, deepen it.

      You seem to think Western Caucasoid people would dissolve even without the huge aid provided by the occupiers. Despite how uncomfortable that feels, I agree.
      I also expect a loss of will-to-live and nihilism will overtake the ranks of the alien elite, some decades later (look at nativity rates in “their ‘country’ “, or responses of their youth to polls).

      Even that Islam they are so fond of, and so keen of nurturing because it helps them displace whom they hate most, will end up turning against them later.

      Intelligence is not everything. If, for a set of reasons, a group takes hatred as their master, it will blind them to the point that, for the sake of destroying whom they hate, they’ll enable their own demise.


      • i d says:

        (these comments can’t be edited. You can only add another one)

        You forgot the private bank going by the name of FED in your list of occupation-enforcing institutions.


      • Well of course there is decline even without a hostile elite. Look at the civic founding principles of this country. Look at the left’s narrative of fulfilling them vs the right’s narrative of defending them. Either way you get deracinated “equality,” the abolition of quality and difference, and condemnation of those who speak out against it. Greg Hood’s new book from Counter-Currents is about this, how America was flawed from its inception, from an identitarian or nationalist perspective.


  24. Pingback: Florida as a Site of Conflict Between Colonists and Natives | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  25. Pingback: Lawrence Murray, "Florida as a Site of Conflict Between Colonists and Natives" | Counter-Currents Publishing

  26. Pingback: What’s Missing from Brexit | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  27. Pingback: Lawrence Murray, "What's Missing from Brexit" | Counter-Currents Publishing

  28. Pingback: Survival or Union: The European Question | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  29. Pingback: Dindu Terror in Dallas: A Case of Applied Third Worldism | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  30. Pingback: America’s Consensus Pronounced Dead | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  31. Pingback: Living with Terrorism | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  32. Pingback: Trump the Redeemer, Trump the Destroyer | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  33. Pingback: Trump the Redeemer, Trump the Destroyer – Foundations of The Twenty-First Century

  34. Pingback: Jihad in High Germany | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  35. Pingback: Džihád v jižním Německu | Délský potápěč

  36. Pingback: Clinton ex Cathedra | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  37. Pingback: What Would an Alt-Right Administration Look Like? | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  38. Pingback: Mapping the Rising Tide | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  39. Pingback: Esoteric Kekism, or Kek as a Bodhisattva of Racial Enlightenment | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  40. Pingback: Could White Advocacy Exist in a Multi-Ethnic Society? | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  41. Pingback: Alt-RINOs, Those Who Incur the Wrath of Kek | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  42. Pingback: Physical, Legal, and Virtual: The Wall Against Time | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  43. Pingback: 10 Types of Anti-White Commenters | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  44. Pingback: Lawrence Murray, "Survival or Union: The European Question" | Counter-Currents Publishing

  45. Pingback: The Right Style Guide | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  46. Pingback: What Will Become of the Empire? Visions of Late Modernity in United States | ATLANTIC CENTURION

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s