Liberal Iconoclasm: Stamping Out the Wilsonian Heresy at Princeton

wwilsonmeme

One of the defining features of 2015 has been the intensifying liberal iconoclasm against White and Anglo-American history, symbols and spaces in the United States (1, 2, 3, 4). This should come as no surprise given the ascendancy of ((((cultural marxism)))) and popular belief in the moral authority of people of color over Whites. The latest icon slated for smashing and  burning is none other than Princeton University’s own Woodrow Wilson, President of the United States during WWI, a Progressive Democrat, and ardent proponent of the UN’s antecedent, the League of Nations. More than perhaps any American president, Wilson played an instrumental role in undermining European imperialism, participating in the first world war on behalf of national liberation and democracy. The German and Austro-Hungarian empires were dismantled, while the French and British empires would barely last another generation thanks to internal and global shifts in power dynamics and anti-imperial ideology created by the Allied “victory” over the Central Powers.

The language of self-determination and decolonization that the League of Nations meant to implement would ultimately be taken up by its successor, the United Nations, today the third world’s first and foremost lobbying group. Such a legacy makes Wilson something of a founding father of that variety of liberalism that wants to save the entire world and fight oppression to the point of self-harm—Wilson fell ill and ultimately died from complications developed while campaigning for his postwar policies across the United States—which is all too familiar today. But alas, the American leftist and his golems of color do not believe in a usable past and hold all history to the standards of the Current Year®. The historical record indicates Woodrow Wilson was a racist and a Klan sympathizer who supported segregation, making him easily one of the worst human beings to have ever lived.

A brief note about segregation: The exodus of competent blacks from black communities into White spaces facilitated by desegregation/integration—much like the exodus of competent people of color from third world countries—has impoverished those communities of leadership, generational stability and growth, and a tax base more than any White person “culturally appropriating” or being “culturally insensitive” ever has. These same mobile blacks are also vociferously opposed to both white flight (White people leaving) and gentrification (White people moving in), indicating they also favor a level of segregation for themselves. Wilson was perhaps one of you.

Returning to the issue of iconoclasm, there isn’t much more to be said that isn’t plainly obvious to a millennial college student about race and politics in American society. Wilson is a White person who lived before 2008. It’s completely unacceptable that we honor him in any way shape or form. The only reason to keep his name and portrait around anything at Princeton would be as a ‘teachable moment’ that could be used to have a ‘conversation about race.’ Both of these are, of course, opportunities to denigrate Whites for being White and to agitate for ‘racial justice,’ which is just POC tribalism against non-POC, which sometimes includes Asians.

What is considered progressive is constantly redefined since achieving progress is a utopian project. Since progressing itself is a state of motion, how can anything which has passed remain progressive? The past becomes inherently bad, and so does identifying with it or utilizing it to build something in the present. Well, unless of course you were oppressed, then your selective interpretation of the past is an opportunity for rent-seeking. This is where progress leads, to damnatio memoriae. Wilson today, LBJ tomorrow, Clinton not long after.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in America, Culture, Politics and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Liberal Iconoclasm: Stamping Out the Wilsonian Heresy at Princeton

  1. “Since progressing itself is a state of motion, how can anything which has passed remain progressive?”

    Well said, Sir.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Jacob says:

    “A brief note about segregation: The exodus of competent blacks from black communities into White spaces facilitated by desegregation/integration—much like the exodus of competent people of color from third world countries—has impoverished those communities of leadership, generational stability and growth, and a tax base more than any White person “culturally appropriating” or being “culturally insensitive” ever has. These same mobile blacks are also vociferously opposed to both white flight (White people leaving) and gentrification (White people moving in), indicating they also favor a level of segregation for themselves. Wilson was perhaps one of you.

    Returning to the issue of iconoclasm, there isn’t much more to be said that isn’t plainly obvious to a millennial college student about race and politics in American society. Wilson is a White person who lived before 2008. It’s completely unacceptable that we honor him in any way shape or form. The only reason to keep his name and portrait around anything at Princeton would be as a ‘teachable moment’ that could be used to have a ‘conversation about race.’ Both of these are, of course, opportunities to denigrate Whites for being White and to agitate for ‘racial justice,’ which is just POC tribalism against non-POC, which sometimes includes Asians.”
    Lol no:http://nilevalleypeoples.blogspot.com/2015/08/how-obama-plays-upon-white-guilt-hilary.html
    Also wilson was a racist who pretend to be a facist
    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/history_lesson/2010/10/hating_woodrow_wilson.html

    Like

    • That article seems to imply that there is no White guilt but that there should be, which is pretty funny. And as I’ve never read a Glenn Beck book or watched Fox, I have very little interest in what Slate has to say about them.

      Like

    • ryu238 says:

      “That article seems to imply that there is no White guilt but that there should be, which is pretty funny. And as I’ve never read a Glenn Beck book or watched Fox, I have very little interest in what Slate has to say about them.” So because there isn’t any white guilt for whites taking advantage of minorities and playing the victim card…it doesn’t exist?

      Like

      • What is your agenda in promoting the idea White guilt? It’s a social construct to suggest one racial group is collectively responsible for something. And if I don’t buy into that I will reject it.

        Like

  3. Pingback: It’s the Current Year, Why Does America’s Cold War Cartel Still Exist? | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  4. Pingback: American Aberrationalism: Trump is Normal, the Republican Party is Not | ATLANTIC CENTURION

  5. Pingback: Lawrence Murray, "American Aberrationalism: Trump is Normal, the Republican Party is Not" | Counter-Currents Publishing

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s